Market Talk

Gluskin Sheff’s David Rosenberg rips apart the Obama administration’s latest “emerging program to jolt the economic recovery from its stall,” as the NY Times characterizes it (don’t you dare call it stimulus.) I can’t recall seeing Rosenberg this overly political before; usually he keeps to purely economic themes. It’s safe to say he isn’t a fan of the latest ideas.

I’d argue that the Bush tax cuts didn’t have nearly as much to do with the Aughts rally as the Fed’s low interest rates did, and the booming business in unregulated derivatives, but that’s a quibble.

My great problem with the Obama administration is that the President didn’t go full-bore at the economy the day he got into office. Sure, he pushed the $800 billion stimulus program. But while the price tag was massive, the effort itself was lazy. About the easiest thing in the world for a government to do is to throw money at a problem. I’d rather have seen some creative solutions. Something, anything. Instead, we got a rush job with the stimulus program, and then the White House moved on to more “important” matters, like healthcare.

Anyhow, the latest raft of proposals, which add up to a second stimulus program no matter how they are characterized, are likely to have the same temporary, sugar-rush effect of the first program, if they have any effect at all. As Rosenberg points out, the biggest problem for corporations isn’t exactly a lack of cash.

Aren’t businesses sitting on a record cash hoard right now? In other words, “money” is not an impediment towards business investment growth, say, as much as the regulatory policy backdrop.

This is again one in a long list of quick fixes aimed at boosting domestic spending and is likely to have muted impact, in our view. Even if it does have an impact, it will merely bring forward spending that would have occurred in any event and merely distort the quarterly flow of GDP data much like ‘cash for clunkers’ and the housing tax credits did for the household sector.

Continue reading…

So now that the U.S. — apparently, at least judging by the market’s reactions last week — isn’t a concern anymore, the markets are turning once again to Europe. Funny how these things work, isn’t it?

- Considering the “uncomfortably uncertain” mood heading into this morning’s jobs data, the report wasn’t that bad. “The overall picture is of a labor market that continues to chug along in the right direction, albeit far too slowly,” Ryan Avent notes. “The pace of employment recovery implies several long, hard years ahead for American workers. But given the mood on markets and around dinner tables lately, one has to appreciate the continuation of the upward trend.”

- Stocks popped Friday on the jobs data, but Capital Gains and Games blogger Andrew Samwick says the report merely represents “more of the same” for the labor market. “There is nothing in here that merits joy,” he writes. “Expect the spinmeisters to focus on the rise in private sector employment (up 763,000 since the low in December 2009) and the upward revisions (to smaller job losses) from the two prior months.”

- The positive vibe (at least for stocks) generated from nonfarm payrolls data can’t be sitting well with former labor secretary Robert Reich. “The Great Jobs Depression continues to worsen,” Reich writes on his blog. “The last time we saw anything on this scale was in the 1930s…The practical choice we face is this: Either major action to reverse the jobs emergency or years of intolerably high unemployment coupled with demagoguery and scapegoating.”

- August jobs report offers a “small sigh of relief,” but the big takeaway is the labor market remains essentially flat, Reuters blogger Felix Salmon says. “Flat, then, is the new up — which only goes to demonstrate just how worried the markets are about a double-dip recession,” he writes. “We’re not remotely in full-bore recovery mode yet.”

- August auto sales, released earlier this week, were portrayed as worst sales in 27 years. But that’s not best way to interpret the data, James Hamilton writes at Econbrowser. “The story for autos remains pretty much what it has been for some time — we’ve bounced off the bottom, but remain stuck at a point far below what would normally be expected. Double dip? Not here, not yet. Disappointingly sluggish growth? Very much so.”

- “The outlook for subpar growth and weak job creation — although superior to a new recession — is a real and present danger, and today’s employment report doesn’t offer much reason to dismiss the danger,” James Picerno writes at The Capital Spectator. “If the economy continues to struggle, eventually the risk of a recession will become more than a low-probability prediction.”

- Mark Thoma uses the central valley in California as a metaphor for economic recovery. “It’s narrow east to west, but very long north to south,” he notes at Economist’s View. “We went down into the valley as we went into the recession, and the question for me has always been whether we are heading east to west so that we will climb out of the valley relatively quickly, or north to south as we trudge along at the bottom of the valley for considerable time…The fact that we’ve had essentially no growth for a year now, and no hint of change any time soon, makes the north to south fear very real.”

- Barnes & Noble’s (BKS) battle with activist investor Ron Burkle is symbolic of a “big fish swallowing a small fish only to be itself swallowed by an even bigger one,” Josh Brown writes at The Reformed Broker. “Founder Len Riggio built the largest bookseller on earth by putting thousands of mom & pops under his sword across the country,” Brown notes. “Now he himself is facing his own possible destruction from the twin threats of shareholder activist Ron Burkle and the disintermediation of the digital age.”

- With Dell pulling out of the 3Par (PAR) bidding war, Robert Cyran wonders if Dell shareholders are on Xanax. Dell investors “displayed neither much concern about overpayment nor relief about the deal being dropped,” he says. “After a decade of scandals, missed opportunities and dismal performance, they may have stopped caring.”

- Just your typical brawl at the US Open.

I've been here a year, Jack; when do you think the jobs are coming?

Here’s your takeaway from the jobs report: The jobs market isn’t getting any worse. It isn’t getting any better either.

Nothing much changed in August for the nation’s work force, and nothing much has changed in the past year either. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 54,000 people lost their jobs in August, with 114,000 temporary Census Bureau workers coming to the end of that gig, while the private sector added 67,000 jobs.

Now, the stock market is reacting because the numbers were the proverbial “better than expected.” Consensus was for an overall slide of 110,000, with private sector adding 28,000 jobs. That’s all the market cares about, and seeing as it’s in rally mode anyway, it’s set to extend that rally.

This is such a middling report, it can probably be spun any way you’d want to spin it, so it’s best to try and look at the biggest picture possible. I’ll frame it this way: we’re eight months into 2010, and the economy has added a net total of 723,000 jobs. Job growth rose the first five months of the year, and has fallen the past three months. That averages out to 90,000 jobs a month, which is not even enough to keep up with population growth, forget starting to whittle down that 15 million-strong sea of unemployed people out there.

So this report is nothing to get all hot and bothered over, even though the stock market undoubtedly will.

There were some positives, let’s not kid ourselves. The revisions to July and June narrowed the losses in those months, which is a good thing. The number of people out of work for more than six months slipped to 42% from 45%; still a distressingly high number, but still a slight improvement.

However, the official unemployment rate edged up to 9.6%, and the broadest measure of unemployment, the U-6, rose to 16.7%. A year ago this time, the official rate was at 9.7% and the U-6 was at 16.8%, and haven’t changed dramatically during the entire time, so we’ve gone essentially nowhere in a year. If you believe the recession ended in July 2009, as so many do, then you’re talking about a year that was supposed to be a year of recovery for the economy. The jobs market didn’t get that memo.

“It will take many years before ‘full employment’ is re-attained,” Steven Wood of Insight Economics wrote. In August, there were 14.7M people unemployed (according to this table; in the actual release, BLS says it’s 14.9M); in August of 2009, there were 14.8M people unemployed.

- Soaring currency trading volume won’t have a happy ending. “It is a Fool’s Goldrush and will end horribly for most,” Josh Brown writes at The Reformed Broker. “The good news is, you can take the cautionary tales of the stock game, the mortgage game and the real estate game and figure out how you want to be positioned when the inevitable boom-bust-hatred cycle shifts into high gear.”

- Former Lehman CEO Dick Fuld was given a “surprisingly sympathetic ear” from the FCIC at yesterday’s hearing. “This is a deeply disturbing development,” Barry Ritholtz says at The Big Picture. “It leads to the unfortunate suspicion that the FCIC does not have the slightest clue as to the causes of the housing collapse, recession and market crash…I now fear the FCIC report is going to be an ideological farce.”

- It’s becoming obvious there is “no magic bullet” to immediately speed up the recovery, Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff writes. “It took more than a decade to dig today’s hole, and climbing out of it will take a while, too,” he says. “Americans will have to be patient for many years as the financial sector regains its health and the economy climbs slowly out of its hole.”

- Investor demand for US Treasuries has waned over the last few sessions after some better-than-expected economic reports. But the “big test” comes tomorrow morning with the August nonfarm payroll report. “A smaller loss of jobs could stoke more optimism about the economy and raise more questions about how much lower interest rates can or should go in the near term,” LA Times’ Tom Petruno says. “But a bigger loss could re-energize bond bulls.”

- Yesterday was a 90% upside day, “the 13th such so-called panic-buying day since the April 26 high,” Jeff Cooper notes at Minyanville. Meanwhile, there’s been 14 panic-selling days during the same period, he says. “This kind of volatility is a market in disarray. It’s not a sign of a healthy market,” he says. “Risk runs high when frenzy runs deep.”

- Slate’s James Ledbetter wonders why people consistently underestimate Netflix (NFLX). “There is one company that has been more consistently underestimated than any other, whose innovations, growth, and, indeed, survival have been dismissed and denied for nearly all its corporate life. That’s Netflix,” he says. But “while its critics were flailing away, the company has continued to grow steadily and spread its influence well beyond the red envelope.”

- AOL renewing and expanding its search agreement with Google (GOOG) was a “surprisingly quick and even stealthy move,” Kara Swisher reports at All Things D.

- “Summertime, and the living is easy…for many, too easy. This July was the worst on record for youth employment: Less than half of all 16- to 24-year-olds had a job,” WSJ’s Heard on the Street says. “Meanwhile, at the other end of the spectrum, more than 40% of over-55s have work or are looking for it, the highest share since JFK was in office.”

- Housing prices still need to drop by 10% in order for the market to correct itself, Barry Ritholtz tells Tech Ticker.

- For all the runners out there, WSJ’s Nick Wingfield reviews three running apps.

Bernanke launching "unconventional measures."

Sounds as if former Fed vice chairman and Princeton professor Alan Blinder has changed his tune a bit. Hat tip to Gluskin Sheff’s David Rosenberg for pointing out this Blinder quote in a NY Times story late last week:

The Fed has run out of the strong tools, and is turning to the weak ones…When you’re fighting in a foxhole and you’ve used up the machine guns and hand grenades, then you pull out the swords and start throwing rocks.

The Times went on to quote Blinder as saying the economy seemed “substantially worse” than it did three months ago.

Interesting, Alan. Three months ago, eh? That’s around the time the good professor penned an op-ed for the WSJ (so rich we had to clip it out and save it in the bottom file drawer), titled “Government to the Economic Rescue.”

Continue reading…

US stocks rally sharply, after the Fed chairman pledges to do “whatever it takes” to pull the economy out of any tailspin, which is a nice reassurance since that’s exactly where the economy seems to be headed.

DJIA surges 165 (1.7%) to 10151; even with the rally, the index lost 0.6% on the week. S&P 500 jumps 17 (1.7%) to 1065, importantly after bouncing hard off support at 1040 – which may point to short covering. Nasdaq Comp gains 35 (1.7%) to 2154.

Stocks rally even after 2Q GDP gets revised down to 1.6% – and the 3Q isn’t looking so hot either, by the way. By now, you know the parade of bad news that was ignored today: Intel cut its 3Q revenue outlook, consumer confidence slipped, Boeing delayed the Dreamliner again, the ECRI’s weekly leading index showed no improvement and remains mired at recessionary levels.

The market is apparently taking Fed Chairman Bernanke at his word that he will do “whatever it takes” to pull the economy out of any tailspin – the infamous Bernanke (nee Greenspan) put. This is giving a big boost to the risk trade – heck Boeing was the Dow’s third-best component today, after risk-trade darling Caterpillar and IBM.

So, the market rallied either because of a massive short-covering surge, a belief in the Fed’s ability to arrest the economy’s slide, we’ll be polite and refrain from calling it a misguided belief, or the market just has absolutely no idea what’s going on. We’d put our money on either number one or number two, but neither is particularly inspiring.

Just need a some more unconventional measures to get airborne again.

Not at all surprising that the stock market is rallying after Ben Bernanke outlines actions the Fed can take, so-called “unconventional measures,” in an attempt to prop up a laboring economy. The measures would basically just offer another boost to asset prices.

And dismiss right now the notion that the Fed’s waiting for the outlook “to deteriorate significantly” before it resorts to its “unconventional measures.” We’ve just seen GDP growth drop from 5% to 1.6% in six months — that’s some significant deterioration, in our book, and the central bank has proven to be consistently behind in its assessments of the economy. Prepare forthwith for unconventionality.

Unconventional measures…”to provide further stimulus,” Ben says. Sounds imposing, but it’s not. Not imposing and not really that unconventional. The measures are as follows: buy more Treasurys or other assets, further expand the bank’s balance sheet; jawbone, telling the market the Fed will leave rates at zero for longer than the market currently thinks; or cut interest rates on excess reserves.

Continue reading…

This market needs its head examined.

What I’m about to relate is actually beyond anecdotal, because it’s an anecdote the source of which and the majority of the details of which I can’t even remember. But today’s stock market, the rally, the reaction to a literal cavalcade of bad news, reminded me of this quote I’d heard a few years ago.

“Why isn’t the Dow down 1000 points?” That was the reaction of one analyst back in 2008, before Lehman, before AIG, before the panic set in and everybody threw in the towel. It was a day like this, where the news was uniformly bad, but the market was holding up surprisingly well. It made no sense whatsoever. Now, I read that in a market comment from one of the folks I follow regularly, but I can’t remember offhand which one it was; either Art Cashin, or Joan McCullough, maybe it was even Barry Ritholtz. I can’t remember. But I remember the line.

It came back to me today, because this is one of the flat-out just silliest stock sessions I’ve seen in a couple of years. The news is uniformly bad: GDP was revised down sharply. Intel cut its revenue outlook. Boeing delayed the Dreamliner, again. Consumer confidence fell. The ECRI’s weekly leading index remains deep in contraction territory. Ben Bernanke said the Fed’s prepared to go “all in,” but he doesn’t think the Fed will need to go all in. In other words, he said nothing he hasn’t said before.

The market rallied off all that, in one of the screwiest rallies I’ve seen since before the recession started. When you see trading like this, the market rallying sharply on, forget for no good reason, rallying against very good bad reasons, it’s a sign that the “market,” the collective group of traders, speculators, investors, brokers, has lost its collective mind. When you see trading like this, it’s a bad sign, and it makes me think that September, which is historically the market’s worst month, is going to especially bad this time around.

Continue reading…

Heavy video day. In this News Hub Extra, we break down Bernanke’s speech with Societe General chief US economist Stephen Gallagher.