Bloggers’ Meeting With Treasury Highlights Rise In Prominence

Posted by Steven Russolillo on November 12, 2009
Banks, Economy, Treasury Department, Washington
we've come a long way...now don't try manipulating us!

We've come a long way. Now don't try manipulating us!

Financial bloggers have gained a loyal readership and considerable clout during the crisis of the past year. Their prominent role in shaping opinions came into particularly sharp view at a recent meeting.

A group of eight financial bloggers met in Washington on Nov. 2 with senior Treasury officials, including Secretary Tim Geithner. Treasury officials said they organized the two-hour meeting because they recognize the increasing influence financial bloggers have on public opinion and feel it is better to embrace rather than ignore their critics.

The gathering, the first of its kind, represented a milestone in the rise to prominence of the blogosphere. It shows that bloggers are being taken seriously by decision makers, and that kind of access could enhance their credibility among a wider group of readers.

The bloggers in attendance welcomed the opportunity to meet with Treasury officials. However, some expressed concern that their current readers could lose faith if they think the bloggers’ views have been compromised. One blogger admitted after the meeting that he felt sympathetic toward the same policy makers he often criticizes and worried he wouldn’t be as tough on them in the future.

Financial bloggers–a diverse bunch that includes professors, money managers, economists and former public officials, among others–have been gaining prominence analyzing the financial crisis and ensuing recovery, critiquing virtually every move by the government. Several bloggers have developed cult-like followings as a growing audience of readers has drifted to alternative media outlets.

Andrew Williams, a Treasury Department spokesman, said the invitation to meet with bloggers was part of the Obama administration’s continued outreach efforts to keep the lines of communication open with several influential groups.

“We’re trying to open a dialogue and get an opportunity to represent our point of view,” he said. “It’s important to get in front of our critics as well as our supporters.”

For bloggers, the agenda was obvious.

“Talking to the blogosphere is a way to try to control the message,” said Yves Smith, author of naked capitalism and one of the bloggers who attended the meeting. “It’s not that they care about our opinions. It’s propaganda; there’s no question about it.”

The meeting helped Treasury officials gain a greater understanding of what bloggers are trying to accomplish in their writing, while bloggers were able to see a side of some top-level administration officials that isn’t usually portrayed to the public, according to David Merkel, chief economist and director of research at Finacorp Securities and a blogger who attended the meeting.

Whether these bloggers, who certainly aren’t ones to hold back their disdain on controversial issues, start altering the tone of their writing remains to be seen.

“The mere invitation made me more favorably disposed to policy makers,” wrote Interfluidity blogger Steve Randy Waldman after the meeting, while acknowledging he refused to eat cookies that Treasury officials offered merely out of principle. “Although the format of our meeting did not lend itself to forging deep relationships, I was flattered and grateful for the meeting and left with more sympathy for the people I spoke to than I came in with. In other words, I have been corrupted, a little.”

Tom Graff, managing director at Cavanaugh Capital Management in Baltimore and a blogger who attended the meeting, said he would welcome using the meeting as a stepping stone to cultivating relationships with Treasury officials in the future.

If bloggers had better access to policy makers who could confirm or deny different topics or theories, it would improve the blogosphere’s credibility by allowing for more legitimate instead of speculative writing, he said.

But that doesn’t mean he plans to sacrifice what he writes in order to garner more favor among government officials.

“I’m not going to poison my writing just on this pie-in-the-sky idea that I’m going to be Tim Geithner’s buddy,” Graff said.

  • MySpace
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Digg
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , ,

11 Comments to Bloggers’ Meeting With Treasury Highlights Rise In Prominence

Anon
November 12, 2009

The pre-invite process is a dance — they don’t want to get rejected by anyone, so they send an intermediary to ask if you would attend if invited.

I know of more than one blogger who said “No thanks” — for the reasons the bloggers who went enunciated.

Eating warm cookies from Treasury is not how you maintain pressure on them to do whats right, rather than politically expedient

archer
November 13, 2009

That is not correct, you should not spread disinformation. The Treasury sent invites directly via e-mail. This says whoever told you they were invited wasn’t and was trying to bolster their image.

[...] Bloggers’ Meeting With Treasury Highlights Rise In Prominence Steve Russillio. A fair piece, but I don’t buy the headline assumption. This session was a symptom of Team Obama being very aggressive about message control (per the way they have tried corralling liberal groups) and illustrates how Team Obama approaches the world (through a PR lens). They are just willing to go much further down the food chain than past administrations would have (the absurd number of sent by President Obama as a result of my having given a wee bit of money out of sheer horror at the Palin acceptance speech is another indicator of how far they like to reach). It has very little to do with bloggers per se. [...]

[...] Bloggers’ Meeting With Treasury Highlights Rise In Prominence Steve Russillio. A fair piece, but I don’t buy the headline assumption. This session was a symptom of Team Obama being very aggressive about message control (per the way they have tried corralling liberal groups) and illustrates how Team Obama approaches the world (through a PR lens). They are just willing to go much further down the food chain than past administrations would have (the absurd number of sent by President Obama as a result of my having given a wee bit of money out of sheer horror at the Palin acceptance speech is another indicator of how far they like to reach). It has very little to do with bloggers per se. [...]

Steven Russolillo
November 13, 2009

A select group of 26 bloggers were invited via email by the Treasury Department about two weeks prior to the event. Only eight attended. The short notice may have had something to do with the small turnout, although I assume other factors contributed to the decision as well.

[...] Finance bloggers are now being taken seriously by policymakers.  What does it mean for the future of the blogosphere?  (DJ Market Talk) [...]

Anon
November 13, 2009

It was me — I wasn’t looking to brag, but to note the process I went through

Then again, i have been more critical than most on that list. . .

RG
November 13, 2009

Yves

You should never donate to a national political party - either party. They’ll just fill your mail box with more requests for donations. In short order they’ll spend more soliciting additional donations from you than you donated to begin with because they are always flush with cash.

Find a good charity where the money may actually do some good and donate there instead!

SavCD
November 15, 2009

The world is changing. As the readers on Marketwatch always say, they rely more on the other bloggers for news and information more than MSM. It is to the advantage of MSM to follow the bloggers and look for new stories.

SavCD
November 15, 2009

It was the bloggers who called the recent elections. Bloggers seem to be disproportionately Independents. While the parties try to focus on pleasing certain niches of their voter base, they forget about the Independents who are growing in number and DON’T vote party line. The brutality of their shift was most evident in Virginia and NJ. The Dems and Repubs simply cancel each other out,the Independents decide elections.

The three big issues with Independents are: (1) Our unemployment is disproportionately unskilled with low education achievement. Why are we immigrating more people with the same low skill levels and raising the unemployment rate? Why do we not follow the immigration laws of Canada and Mexico? (2) We are running out of key raw materials and resources (especially clean water), why are we not limiting growth? (3) Why are we using the Stimulus Plan to incent short term domestic consumption rather than long term export growth? It makes little sense to drop the dollar and then have no export growth programs. These are the issues that are important to independents and which should be important to politicians.

There is a belief among Independents that the President has created THE issue for the fall election. He promised to not provide free health care to illegals. There is a belief that as SOON as health care is passed he will make the illegals legal, but once again not apply the same standard to criminals in jail in the U.S. If this occurs, I think he can expect a LANDSLIDE vote from independents and Repubs, and low turnout from his base. This is shaping up to be a 1994 repeat.