A Brief History of Economic Growth in the US

Posted by Paul Vigna on July 28, 2010
Economy, Markets

In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue (trying to get rich.)

The one major question to which I’ve yet to see a good reply, is really quite straightforward: what’s going to drive economic growth in the U.S.?  What’s it going to be? Green energy? Space exploration? Interactive Cabbage-Patch Kids?

We’re at a crossroads here. Consumers aren’t spending. Businesses aren’t spending. The government, despite the fervent wishes of some of our representatives at the federal level, isn’t going to be spending much more, and at the state level they’re in full-on Greece austerity mode.

We won’t get past this recession, or soft patch, or malaise, or dip, or whatever you want to call it, until something comes along that spurs businesses and people to start spending money, their own money. Looking back over U.S. history, there has always been some fundamental thing driving us. Even before there was a United States, even before there were 13 British colonies. (Now before we go any further, let’s get one thing clear: this isn’t some college thesis, I’m just trying to make a general point; if I skip an epoch or two, don’t crucify me over it.)

I just don’t see that fundamental thing right now, although I don’t doubt (or at least, I hope) one will come along. People talk about emerging markets, but unless we’re going to restructure our economy, and become a manufacturing-based economy rather than a consumption-based one, I don’t see where emerging markets do much for the U.S. Are we really going to start selling cheap toasters to China?

Green energy has a chance, I suppose, but we’ve been pushing alternative energies for 30 years. Hasn’t gotten very far. What else? Space exploration seems far to expensive, and the returns far too skimpy, to lend a practical hand (although being old enough to remember the tail end of the Apollo program, I’m a big fan in theory.)  Honestly, if you’ve an idea, send it along. Whoever figures this one out first is going to get rich.

Let’s go back to the very start. Columbus wasn’t looking for a new world, he was looking for a faster way to get to China. All the Europeans were. Columbus just decided to go west when everybody else was going east. Visions of Utopia became a guiding force for waves of Europeans, the Frontier, Manifest Destiny, Westward Ho and all that. This would be the fundamental thing that drove the nation for nearly 400 years (and before it was over it gave us far, far too many innovations to list here.)

Then you had the Gilded Age, World War I, the Roaring ’20s, the Great Depression and then World War II. Lots of ups and downs there (more downs than ups.) But, and here’s the important point, after World War II, the United States had a new guiding fundamental thing: rebuild the world. It was both a great humanitarian and economic success. It made the U.S. the world preeminent economic, as well as military and political, power. It created the great, stable middle class that became a hallmark of the nation. That middle class, incidentally, is what’s being buried in our current era (but that’s a subject for another post.)

In the ’60s you had the Cold War and the space race. This scramble also produced too many innovations to recount here; laptop computers, rocketry, Tang, even a little thing that would one day become another great economic driver. Then in the ’70s, it all started to fall apart. The United States had rebuilt the world, and suddenly the world started competing. It was all kind of a big shock.

When Reagan was elected President in 1980, he brought with him, along with a lot of folksy, inspirational rhetoric, a new economic paradigm. They called it supply-side, or trickle down. The detractors called it voodoo economics. Cut taxes, boost public spending. It worked, for a while.

Who knows what would have happened there if that little thing that was invented in the ’60s didn’t explode in the ’90s. You knew what I was talking about: the Internet. That sparked a huge boom, which sort of, well, exploded right around 2000 and led us into a recession. Who knows where that recession would’ve gone had not our highly lauded Fed chairman, Alan Greenspan, cut the fed funds rate to 1% and held it there for like a year.

That, and wasn’t the only cause but it was the spark, gave us the housing bubble, which is what drove things in the Aughts, and well, we all know how that one ended. So that’s about it. That brings us up to today.

So, what’s it going to be?

Tags: , , , , ,

15 Comments to A Brief History of Economic Growth in the US

Mark Stevens
July 28, 2010

So our empire peaked at the end of the 20th century. Well, maybe that is it. We served our purpose and now it is time for someone else to come along and lead the world, or maybe we will enter a period with no world leader, at least for a time. Why do we assume that we are immune to the cycles of history?

mutant_dog
July 28, 2010

Life. Having the technology to read any genome, swiftly and inexpensively, we humans can now hope to understand life in general. This study will in turn open new branches of knowledge for the scientific enterprise; as it already has done, in proteomics for example. I submit the potential for offshoot technologies boggles the imagination; it is near-infinite. Should keep us busy for a while.

Mark Stevens
July 28, 2010

Yes, I have thought of that. In fact, I do biomedical research. However, biotechnology doesn’t employ that many people and they need to have technical skills which are beyond most people. Biotech will produce many good things but won’t generate millions of jobs.

Raymond Haines
July 28, 2010

Hi Paul, well you know I have spoken about this issue on this site before. I am very concerned about what happens to the middle class in America. In reference to the Reagan tax cuts, it was like a breath of fresh air to an economy that was being stifled by a tax burden. This past decade was froth with the misappropiation of credit which resulted in over consumption. Fundamentally, there is nothing wrong with the U.S.economy. Where the big danger lies is in the future entitlement commitments. There is a worry that we will not be able to grow ourselves enough to cover our debt or commitments, which translates into a large portion of government spending going to service that debt, at both the local and federal level. For example, by the year 2015 at the current trend, the state of Illinois’s pension commitment will take 35 percent of their budget. Solutions – first we have to change the way our governments spends our money. That would take enourmous political courage. We need to encourage our best young minds to go into other fields and not just be creators of financial derivatives. We have to make credit available once again, but lending that makes sense. Bring down regulations that stifle the economy and growth. Create a green economy and advance more conservation. Revamp our education system. Encourage innovation, innovation, innovation. Finally, have targeted tax cuts and stimulus measures that create job growth as a mulitplier.

[...] An interesting post, unfortunately, simply all over the place. However it is a good place to continue the historical series. The one major question to which I’ve yet to see a good reply, is really quite straightforward: what’s going to drive economic growth in the U.S.? What’s it going to be? Green energy? Space exploration? Interactive Cabbage-Patch Kids? [...]

Dr. Spiff
July 28, 2010

Given that we are not going to sell cheap toasters to China, let’s focus on what America has always done best. The driving force behind all our growth has been risk-taking and innovation. Surely, the Declaration of Independence and Constitution were breath-taking pieces of innovation written at great risk. The same driver gave us the Westward March as well as the subsequent epochs in American history. Growth only occurs when individuals are free to succeed or fail. When they are allowed to risk and be rewarded for their risk.

A society with cradle to grave “security”, ruled by an elite is stagnant. Such a society is only concerned with maintaining the status quo. When the risk of failure is eliminated, so is the ability to succeed. After all… We can’t have the proles getting above their station.

The “next big thing” is an idea, just as all the other “big things” have been ideas. The “big idea” now is that freedom allows both failure and success. And freedom cannot be found living under a “nanny” government.

Rocky
July 28, 2010

Geez…the next big thing will be when the BURDEN of GOVERNMENT is reduced enough to get out of the way. I remember the 70’s. LBJ’s Great Society put a screeching halt to the economic boom generated by Kennedy’s tax cuts. The 70’s rolled along as the Dems in chrage, with the help of Nixon and the malasie of Carter continued along the same welfare state path. Reagan came along and dramatically reduced the growth rate of government and 25 year boom followed. Then along comes Fannie, Freddie, Barney Frakn and Chris Dodd with Affrodable Housing creating a housing bubble by lending money to people who couldn’t pay it back and bust we go. Then Obama comes in with an incredible expansion of government and now we’re back to talking like Jimmy Carter…America’s had her run. The Tea Party folks have it right…STOP THIS RIDICULOUS GOVERNMENT SPENDING SPREE…that will be the trigger to the next economic boom…

Raymond Haines
July 28, 2010

Yes, sorry for some of the scattered thoughts. I see a lot that needs to be fixed here in this great land. In short, I don’t think there is any holy grail, clearly innovation is what we do well, and this will help. Finding a greener energy economy could promote jobs and help cut our trade deficit.

Steven L.
July 28, 2010

What we are now experiencing in America is an “inverse wealth effect.”

Remember when we heard about the “wealth effect”: Americans felt rich because their homes had increased in value and their 401(k)s had increased in value and so they spent more. When now, those things have DECREASED in value–sometimes to the point of being underwater on mortgages and loans–and Americans are feeling poorer. And so they’re not spending.

That won’t change until the excess inventory of homes and apartments is sold off or rented, and demand for new housing starts rising again.

The best way to get that going is to encourage, not discourage, immigration to the U.S. All those immigrants will need housing.

Otherwise, the housing market will remain in the doldrums for years. And with it, the U.S. consumer.

Steven L.
July 28, 2010

The author mentioned that America grew for 400 years. But he neglected to mention that this growth was fueled by tens of millions of immigrants pouring into the country: Chinese working on the Transcontinental Railroad, Jews working in the garment center and jewelry business in New York City, etc.

The embrace of anti-immigrant nativism is shooting ourselves in the foot economically. Where would America be today without Italian-Americans, Irish-Americans, Jews, Chinese-Americans, etc.

timstevens
July 28, 2010

Not one market-changing invention or technology was created by the government.

Not the PC
Not the internet
Not the laser
Not the shipping container
Not plastic
Not biotechnology
Not the automobile
Not the memory chip
Not the cell phone
Not laptop
Not WIFI
Not the LED
Not the microprocessor

However, the government is directly responsible for creating
The ruling class
The dependent (aka leech) class
The debt
The lousy public (aka government) schools
The public sector unions
The under funded government pensions
The social security ponzi scheme

and the latest
The illegal alien who is entitled to free handouts from US taxpayers

Adam
July 28, 2010

Not even economists can predict the future.

XRayD
July 28, 2010

The writer forgot to mention one recent item that created (for a few) the greatest wealth – out of nothing. Derivatives and Credit Default Swap trading. Financial innovation and risk management.

I have also heard that we are leading the world in another swashbuckling enterprise – Private Equity.

And we have the dollar and the navy. So we shall rule the world for some time to come.

R.NARAYANAN
July 28, 2010

just” I don’t see that fundamental thing right now, although I don’t doubt (or at least, I hope) one will come along.”-the above quote is surely misplaced. The , thing , will notperhaps happen, in the US but elsewhere.As in chip technology, time for leaps get geometrically compressed. What took 30 years from space age to global markets operating at nanosecond scale will now take occur in 10 or less. By 2020 we should be waking up to a new economic philosophy that is more global. Thus recession or boom will spread more even,across all nations.The world would get more cohesive.

[...] to share, because it gets right to the point I was trying to make yesterday in that economic-growth post. Lena Komileva, an analyst at Tuellet Prebon, wrote the following: With economic confidence [...]